Roofing contractor
G.Francis Roofing, Inc.
3 Cos Cob Ave, Cos Cob, CT 06807
Listed under Greenwich, CT
- Google average
- 4.4
- Ratings counted
- 7
- One and two star
- 1 of 7
- Connecticut median
- Not comparable
The first three are Google’s own figures for G.Francis Roofing, Inc., read on 24 September 2026; the share is of every rating Google has counted, not of the review texts on this page. The median is ours — the middle figure among the Connecticut roofers we list with enough ratings to compare.
Rating breakdown
| 5 | 6 | 86% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | 0 | 0% | |
| 1 | 1 | 14% |
Too few ratings to compare against other roofers — at 7 ratings a single unhappy customer moves this figure by several points.
The critical reviews
The one and two-star reviews, first. These are what a star average hides, and they are the reason this page exists.
The only one or two-star review we hold for G.Francis Roofing, Inc..
- 1 out of 5Gregg Cortese6 years ago
Getting George was problematic but eventually we connected and he repaired my roof. It took him 2-3 months to send me a bill. After another couple of months, the repair work performed became defective. I called to ask to have the roof repared and explained I was concerned about water damage if it rained. It took him almost a week to get back to me. In the interim, I had to get another roofer to repair his work. I do not recommend george if you are looking for a timely and responsive contractor.
Other reviews we hold
4 more of the 5 reviews we hold text for, most recent first. We do not hold every review Google has.
- 5 out of 5National Powerboat Association5 months ago
Thank you G Franics for fixing my leaky roof!! The crew was respectful, worked quickly and cleaned up completely before leaving.
- 5 out of 5Adfrenz12 years ago
This company just replaced my roof and I couldn’t be happier! Whole job was done in less than a week with 0 mess left behind. Thanks G Francis!
- 5 out of 5Shawn Lacosta2 years ago
Best Roofer in Fairfield County… highly recommend. Excellent to work with
Google cut this review short. The full text is on their Google profile.
- 5 out of 5Hildi Maclean8 years ago
The owner and his team were very professional, and the quality of the work was first rate. I would certainly use them again.
What G.Francis Roofing, Inc. says about itself
Taken from the business’s own website. We have not checked any of it. These are quotes, not credentials — a roofer writing “licensed and insured” on their homepage is not evidence that they are.
Licensed
“…? Fully Licensed & Insured Established in 1977…”
License number shown
“…Skip to content Connecticut Contractors License # 548947 Call for a Quote: 203-661-3750 Home…”
States a founding year
“…Offering superior roofing services since 1977 Contact Us For a Free Estimate…”
Free estimates
“…services since 1977 Contact Us For a Free Estimate 203-661-3750 Contact Us About Us From…”
Their site also states: insured.
Other roofers in Greenwich
Ranked by how many ratings Google has counted.
| Roofing contractor | Google average | Ratings counted | One and two star | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leon Restoration Inc.copper work, gutters, projects5.019 ratings0% one and two star(203) 223-7801 | 5.0 | 19 | 0%0 of 19 | (203) 223-7801 |
| J. Salvatore & Sons Roofing- CTrenovation, efficient, communication5.018 ratings0% one and two star(203) 869-9300 | 5.0 | 18 | 0%0 of 18 | (203) 869-9300 |
Where this page comes from
Every figure above is Google’s, captured on 24 September 2026. The star average and the 7 ratings behind it are counted by Google across all of its reviews. The review text on this page is a sample — we hold 7, of which 5 have any text — and it is not everything Google shows.
Roof Warden does not verify licenses, bonds, insurance or workers’ compensation cover, and nothing on this page should be read as though we had. Confirm those directly with the contractor and with your state or provincial licensing body before you hire anyone.
There is not much data on G.Francis Roofing, Inc.. A short record here means our capture found little — not that there is nothing to find, and not that the business is new or inactive.